Today is Sine Die, the final day of session in the 2010 GA Assembly. Your urgent help on the phones is being requested to get pieces of legislation important to conservatives signed into law.
1. HB 1184 - Insurance; authorize insurers to offer individual medical/surgical health insurance that have been approved for issuance in selected states. Provides for selling insurance across state lines.
Passed in the House 4/21. Needs support to pass in the Senate, particularly from Renee Unterman (D-45 Buford/Gwinnett) and Seth Harp (D-29 Midland near Columbus).
CALL IN SUPPORT OF:
Renee Untermann-(404) 463-1368/(770) 945-1887. Email: renee.unterman@
senate.ga.gov
Seth Harp-(706) 323-2761 (O) (706) 323-0182 (F). Email: seth.harp@senate.ga.gov
Special instructions: now having been down at the capitol I can tell you firsthand the importance of being polite, firm, and persistent. Nasty gets you shut out of the process! Lobbyists say "don't take OK, No, or anything else from a secretary, but keep calling until citizen lobbyists tell us to stop....which could be toward midnight tonight.
Please post on facebook and tweet.
ALSO FOR THE SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES:
2. SB 529 -A BILL to be entitled an Act to amend Title 16 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to crimes and offenses, so as to specify certain acts that constitute criminal abortion; to provide for certain criminal and civil remedies for criminal abortion; to provide for notification of certain investigations; to provide for definitions; to provide for prohibitions on the circumstances under which an abortion may be performed; to revise the definition of the term "racketeering activity" to include certain conduct relating to criminal abortion; to provide for related matters; to provide for an effective date and applicability; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.
This is understood to be key to overturning Roe v Wade.
Call Speaker David Ralston (Blue Ridge) and insist on a floor vote
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
WHEN SOCIAL SECURITY WAS USED FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
SIMPLE FACTS ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY
Your Social Security
Received this from a friend; too valuable to not share with everyone else:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this: It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your kids. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts!!!
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message was removed.
Above, an old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,
“No longer Voluntary”
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65% on the first $90,000
3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,
Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore:
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month –
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' -- you may be interested in the following:
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------ --- --
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?
AND MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
The worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it and believe that the Democats are "for the people."
If enough people read and understand this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve.
Maybe not; some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.
But it's worth a try.
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
GOD'S BLESSINGS IN TROUBLED TIMES
A post to remind us: WHO IS IN CHARGE? GOD OR MAN?!
GOD’S BLESSING IN TIMES OF TROUBLE
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside totally worn out and proclaiming, WOW what a ride!!!!
The moment You receive this say:
Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name, Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven, give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. For thine is the Kingdom, the Power and the Glory. Forever and ever. Amen.
GOD WANTED ME TO TELL YOU, It shall be well with you this coming year.
No matter how much your enemies try this year, they will not succeed.
You have been destined to make it and you shall surely achieve all your goals this year.
For all of 2010, all your agonies will be diverted and victory and prosperity will be incoming in abundance. Today God has confirmed the end of your sufferings, sorrows and pain because HE that sits on the throne has remembered you. He has taken away the hardships and given you JOY.. He will never let you down.
I knocked at heaven's door this morning, God asked me.. My child! What can I do for you? And I said,
Father, please protect and bless the person reading this message......
It has never been broken. Within 48 hours send 20 copies.....
(Or as many as you can -God does know if you don't have 20 people to send it to. It's the effort and intent that counts.) to family and friends.
Please do not break it..
Sunday, April 18, 2010
IS FAITH DISAPPEARING BEFORE OUR EYES?
IS FAITH DISAPPEARING BEFORE OUR VERY EYES?
“Fasting and prayer are religious exercises; the enjoining them an act of discipline. Every religious society has a right to determine for itself the time for these exercises, and the objects proper for them, according to their own particular tenets and right can never be safer than in their hands, where the Constitution has deposited it.” Thomas Jefferson, 1808 [def.of tenet: a principle, belief, or doctrine generally held to be true; especially : one held in common by members of an organization, movement, or profession].
Because of the faith of many of our founding fathers, public prayer and national days of prayer have a long-standing and significant history in American tradition. For example, The Supreme Court affirmed the right of state legislatures to open their sessions with prayer in Marsh vs. Chambers (1983).
The National Day of Prayer (NDOP), was established thru a bill and signed by President Truman in 1952. It established that this day was to be determined by each president as a day of his (or her) choice In 1988, President Reagan signed an amendment to the bill establishing the first Thursday of May as a day where members of all faiths could pray together in their own way. Remember that last phrase: “where all faiths could pray together in their own way”. Now along comes U.S. Federal Judge Barbara B. Crabb.
On October 3, 2008 the Freedom From Religion Foundation sued President George W. Bush, et al., at a federal court in Madison, Wisconsin. Their basic argument, as always for a group of agnostics and atheists, was that the NDOP violated the basic principle of “separation of church and state”.
On April 15. 2010, Judge Crabb made a judgment on the case that the National Day of Pray was unconstitutional because it is an "an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function". Quickly, let’s define the term secular as found in Webster’s dictionary: “a. of or relating to the worldly or temporal; b. not overtly or specifically religious; c. not ecclesiastical or clerical “. Can we say a Progressive Judge??!! How did she justify stretching the meaning behind “a religious exercise serving no secular (non- religious) function” as being a constitutional issue. Please, somebody help me understand that rationale. Whether a religious function is inherently non-secular, by definition, does not deem it unconstitutional, whether the function be national or denominational. If Crabb’s judgment was credible, then all churches which received tax-payer funds would be unconstitutional. Now that would include ALL churches, since they receive tithes and donations from tax-paying citizens. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: THIS SECULAR PROGRESSIVE RATIONALE IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!!
President Reagan went the extra step to ensure that all faiths were included and no one faith would be exercised over another. Another argument from FFRF that the National Day of Prayer would allow the federal government to declare Christianity as a national religion was a heavy influence on Judge Crabb’s decision. I guess even Federal Judges don’t understand (or have not read) the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
We have a secular judicial system to work with a band of Progressives and Socialists on the legislative and executive branches of our government. This country is, and has been, throwing Christianity (and inherently other faiths) out the window. AND WE, THE PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN!! We are long overdue to stand up to the court system and our governments, on all levels, and demand that all judgments regarding religious beliefs be based on our God-given rights as influenced by and written into our Constitution.
WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States of America can practice our faith at any time, regardless of what the courts say. WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, CAN AND WILL PRACTICE OUR FAITH AND EXPRESS OUR VIEWS OF GOD AND HIS ONE TRUE SON, JESUS CHRIST, ANY TIME THAT WE CHOOSE AND THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS WILL JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT!! WE THE PEOPLE OF THE USA WHO PRACTICE OTHER FAITHS SHALL AND MUST PRACTICE THEIR FAITH ANY TIME THAT WE SO CHOOSE AND THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS WILL JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT!! ON THE FIRST THURSDAY OF MAY, MAKE A LOUD VOICE AND EXPRESS YOUR FAITH AND THEN DARE THE GOVERNMENT TO STEP IN!!!.
“Fasting and prayer are religious exercises; the enjoining them an act of discipline. Every religious society has a right to determine for itself the time for these exercises, and the objects proper for them, according to their own particular tenets and right can never be safer than in their hands, where the Constitution has deposited it.” Thomas Jefferson, 1808 [def.of tenet: a principle, belief, or doctrine generally held to be true; especially : one held in common by members of an organization, movement, or profession].
Because of the faith of many of our founding fathers, public prayer and national days of prayer have a long-standing and significant history in American tradition. For example, The Supreme Court affirmed the right of state legislatures to open their sessions with prayer in Marsh vs. Chambers (1983).
The National Day of Prayer (NDOP), was established thru a bill and signed by President Truman in 1952. It established that this day was to be determined by each president as a day of his (or her) choice In 1988, President Reagan signed an amendment to the bill establishing the first Thursday of May as a day where members of all faiths could pray together in their own way. Remember that last phrase: “where all faiths could pray together in their own way”. Now along comes U.S. Federal Judge Barbara B. Crabb.
On October 3, 2008 the Freedom From Religion Foundation sued President George W. Bush, et al., at a federal court in Madison, Wisconsin. Their basic argument, as always for a group of agnostics and atheists, was that the NDOP violated the basic principle of “separation of church and state”.
On April 15. 2010, Judge Crabb made a judgment on the case that the National Day of Pray was unconstitutional because it is an "an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function". Quickly, let’s define the term secular as found in Webster’s dictionary: “a. of or relating to the worldly or temporal; b. not overtly or specifically religious; c. not ecclesiastical or clerical “. Can we say a Progressive Judge??!! How did she justify stretching the meaning behind “a religious exercise serving no secular (non- religious) function” as being a constitutional issue. Please, somebody help me understand that rationale. Whether a religious function is inherently non-secular, by definition, does not deem it unconstitutional, whether the function be national or denominational. If Crabb’s judgment was credible, then all churches which received tax-payer funds would be unconstitutional. Now that would include ALL churches, since they receive tithes and donations from tax-paying citizens. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: THIS SECULAR PROGRESSIVE RATIONALE IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!!
President Reagan went the extra step to ensure that all faiths were included and no one faith would be exercised over another. Another argument from FFRF that the National Day of Prayer would allow the federal government to declare Christianity as a national religion was a heavy influence on Judge Crabb’s decision. I guess even Federal Judges don’t understand (or have not read) the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
We have a secular judicial system to work with a band of Progressives and Socialists on the legislative and executive branches of our government. This country is, and has been, throwing Christianity (and inherently other faiths) out the window. AND WE, THE PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN!! We are long overdue to stand up to the court system and our governments, on all levels, and demand that all judgments regarding religious beliefs be based on our God-given rights as influenced by and written into our Constitution.
WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States of America can practice our faith at any time, regardless of what the courts say. WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, CAN AND WILL PRACTICE OUR FAITH AND EXPRESS OUR VIEWS OF GOD AND HIS ONE TRUE SON, JESUS CHRIST, ANY TIME THAT WE CHOOSE AND THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS WILL JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT!! WE THE PEOPLE OF THE USA WHO PRACTICE OTHER FAITHS SHALL AND MUST PRACTICE THEIR FAITH ANY TIME THAT WE SO CHOOSE AND THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS WILL JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT!! ON THE FIRST THURSDAY OF MAY, MAKE A LOUD VOICE AND EXPRESS YOUR FAITH AND THEN DARE THE GOVERNMENT TO STEP IN!!!.
Monday, April 12, 2010
DISGUST OVER COURT MARTIAL OF NAVY SEALS
Hopefully, Justice is taking over in this madness known as the court-martial of Navy Seals Matthew McCabe, Jonathan Keefe and Julio Huertas. Announced thru AP and confirmed on Fox News this morning (4/06/10), the military judge will allow the testimony of witnesses who saw the capture and arrest of terrorist Ahmed Hashim Abed.
Abed is the terrorist responsible for the capture of four Blackwater employees, including killing, burning, dragging thru the streets and hung on a bridge crossing the Euphrates. These three aforementioned witnesses are also being held in detention. Also, the judge will allow the three Seals to confront Abed in court.
In the meantime, where is the Commander in Chief? POTUS, the CIC of all military forces could end this nonsense with the complete dismissal of this case. "Navy Seals responsible for the capture of the most evil of all terrorists, barring Bin Laden, are being court martialed for punching this "pig" in the face, as claimed by this "pig"??" Proceeding to court-martials based on the claim of this “pig” of a terrorist is a direct assault against our men and women of the armed forces, currently serving and veterans alike. I must remember, however: I’m talking about the President who has repeatedly shown disdain for our military forces and their efforts in our war against terrorism. Oh, my fault: the “engagement against enemy combatants”. I have continuously sent emails and phone calls to the White House imploring the President to step in and end this madness and I will continue to do so, knowing that BHO bears no concern for our men and women in uniform performing their duties of protecting our country. I encourage everyone to call, email, fax, etc. to the White House for BHO to stop this madness NOW.
Abed is the terrorist responsible for the capture of four Blackwater employees, including killing, burning, dragging thru the streets and hung on a bridge crossing the Euphrates. These three aforementioned witnesses are also being held in detention. Also, the judge will allow the three Seals to confront Abed in court.
In the meantime, where is the Commander in Chief? POTUS, the CIC of all military forces could end this nonsense with the complete dismissal of this case. "Navy Seals responsible for the capture of the most evil of all terrorists, barring Bin Laden, are being court martialed for punching this "pig" in the face, as claimed by this "pig"??" Proceeding to court-martials based on the claim of this “pig” of a terrorist is a direct assault against our men and women of the armed forces, currently serving and veterans alike. I must remember, however: I’m talking about the President who has repeatedly shown disdain for our military forces and their efforts in our war against terrorism. Oh, my fault: the “engagement against enemy combatants”. I have continuously sent emails and phone calls to the White House imploring the President to step in and end this madness and I will continue to do so, knowing that BHO bears no concern for our men and women in uniform performing their duties of protecting our country. I encourage everyone to call, email, fax, etc. to the White House for BHO to stop this madness NOW.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER NAVY SEALS COURT MARTIAL?
I've noticed very little coverage from the Main Stream Media (most national papers and publications, along with all 24-hour news networks, with some exception for Fox News). This is an outrage. The facts should be continuously brought forward for We, the People to access readily so that we can see the truth behind this fiasco known as the Navy Seal's court martial (Special Warfare Operator 2nd Class Matthew McCabe). Following is an email that I have been sending to the White House (for the past few weeks) every mornig that calls for the "Commander in Chief" (CIC) to step in and stop this debacle. I will continue to do send this email every morning if the "President" does not take the appropriate action:
EMAIL TO WHITE HOUSE RE: NAVY SEALS COURT MARTIAL
Mr. President,
I implore you, as Commander in Chief of our military forces, to put an end to the court martial of Navy Seals Matthew McCabe, Jonathan Keefe and Julio Huertas. These soldiers, protecting you, me and all Americans, are going thru the court martial based on claims by the wanted terrorist Ahmed Hashim Abed of being punched in the face during his capture. This is the terrorist responsible for the capture, killing, and burning and dragging thru the streets of four Blackwater employees before hanging their bodies on a bridge crossing the Euphrates. On top of that, we have three other witnesses who saw what happened when Abed was detained and will testify under oath that the terrorist was not mistreated. As a veteran, I am deeply saddened and insulted that our CIC has not stepped in and stopped this misuse of the military justice system, the UCMJ. Again, sir, stop this insult against these three Navy Seals, all men and women in uniform serving and sacrificing for our country and for all veterans who have served and sacrificed.
Thank you,
William P. Conant
USAF (veteran)
It is absolutely painful for me to refer to BHO as Commander in Chief, much less as President.
I am now announcing that I will dedicate my free time to addressing the following three issues as my top priorities. There will postings on this blogsite which will be shared on Facebook, sent to my Senators and Representative, sent by email to my friends listed on my address book and posted on the websites of the many Tea Party, 912 and other "RESTORE THE REPUBLIC"-minded organizations that I am a member of. Those topics are:
A. The court martial process of these brave Navy Seals.
B. Barack Obama's (Barry Soetoro) eligibility question
C. Vetted research of candidates for key positions in the House of Representatives, Senators and some state elections with my recommended candidates, with qualifying reasons as to why I am promoting these particular individuals.
IF YOU CARE AS MUCH ABOUT THIS GREAT REPUBLIC KNOWN AS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AS MUCH AS I DO:
GET BUSY, STAND UP FOR OUR AMERICAN HEROES AND OUR GREAT NATION, AND LET'S GET THE CONSTITUTIONALLY-PRINCIPLED, MORALLY ETHICAL CANDIDATES ELECTED INTO THE OFFICES WHICH THEY ARE RUNNING FOR. THE TIME TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY, VOTE OUT OF OFFICE THE RINOS, FAR LEFT SOCIALISTS DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AND THE CURRENT SOCIALISTIC/MARXIST INDIVIDUAL RESIDING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE (BY VOTE OR REMOVAL DUE TO HIS INELIGIBILITY WHEN FINALLY PROVEN IN COURT) WAS "YESTERDAY"!!
EMAIL TO WHITE HOUSE RE: NAVY SEALS COURT MARTIAL
Mr. President,
I implore you, as Commander in Chief of our military forces, to put an end to the court martial of Navy Seals Matthew McCabe, Jonathan Keefe and Julio Huertas. These soldiers, protecting you, me and all Americans, are going thru the court martial based on claims by the wanted terrorist Ahmed Hashim Abed of being punched in the face during his capture. This is the terrorist responsible for the capture, killing, and burning and dragging thru the streets of four Blackwater employees before hanging their bodies on a bridge crossing the Euphrates. On top of that, we have three other witnesses who saw what happened when Abed was detained and will testify under oath that the terrorist was not mistreated. As a veteran, I am deeply saddened and insulted that our CIC has not stepped in and stopped this misuse of the military justice system, the UCMJ. Again, sir, stop this insult against these three Navy Seals, all men and women in uniform serving and sacrificing for our country and for all veterans who have served and sacrificed.
Thank you,
William P. Conant
USAF (veteran)
It is absolutely painful for me to refer to BHO as Commander in Chief, much less as President.
I am now announcing that I will dedicate my free time to addressing the following three issues as my top priorities. There will postings on this blogsite which will be shared on Facebook, sent to my Senators and Representative, sent by email to my friends listed on my address book and posted on the websites of the many Tea Party, 912 and other "RESTORE THE REPUBLIC"-minded organizations that I am a member of. Those topics are:
A. The court martial process of these brave Navy Seals.
B. Barack Obama's (Barry Soetoro) eligibility question
C. Vetted research of candidates for key positions in the House of Representatives, Senators and some state elections with my recommended candidates, with qualifying reasons as to why I am promoting these particular individuals.
IF YOU CARE AS MUCH ABOUT THIS GREAT REPUBLIC KNOWN AS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AS MUCH AS I DO:
GET BUSY, STAND UP FOR OUR AMERICAN HEROES AND OUR GREAT NATION, AND LET'S GET THE CONSTITUTIONALLY-PRINCIPLED, MORALLY ETHICAL CANDIDATES ELECTED INTO THE OFFICES WHICH THEY ARE RUNNING FOR. THE TIME TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY, VOTE OUT OF OFFICE THE RINOS, FAR LEFT SOCIALISTS DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AND THE CURRENT SOCIALISTIC/MARXIST INDIVIDUAL RESIDING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE (BY VOTE OR REMOVAL DUE TO HIS INELIGIBILITY WHEN FINALLY PROVEN IN COURT) WAS "YESTERDAY"!!
Friday, April 9, 2010
CRASHTHETEAPARTY.ORG: LIBERAL LOONIES
Well, the liberal loons are trying another method to embarass the Tea Party movements and events. A new group, Crash the Tea Party, started up early this month. Below is some info from their discussion forum.
This is the latest post by Mad Hatter, administrator for this website, on April 7:
Here's the Idea: The Tea Party is planning protests/rallies on Thurs 4/15 (tax day).
Check Your Local Tea Party Website For Details...
We're going to attend their rally, but plan to have a bunch of truly ludicrous signs. Things that say "Obama drinks Christian Baby Blood" or "Jesus wrote the constitution". The more misspelled words the better...You could also dress in overalls with no shirt, or a stained "wifebeater" t-shirt, But you get the general idea.
Some other thoughts are to ask people at the rally to sign a petition renouncing socialism. See just how much info you can get from these folks (name address, DOB, Social Security #). The more data we can mine from the Tea Partiers, the more mayhem we can cause with it!!!!
Yours Truly
The Mad Hatter
It appears that this site only has 35 members, but they have a lot of views/comments on several discussions that lead one to believe that they may have more members. However, even taking this into consideration, I would say that their current membership is probably less than 100 members. Everyone should post this on all websites that we are members of (Tea Party groups, 912 groups and any other groups of similar philosophies of "RESTORING OUR REPUBLIC". I'll do my best to try get some Fox News attention on this as well (Glenn Beck, etc.).
This is the latest post by Mad Hatter, administrator for this website, on April 7:
Here's the Idea: The Tea Party is planning protests/rallies on Thurs 4/15 (tax day).
Check Your Local Tea Party Website For Details...
We're going to attend their rally, but plan to have a bunch of truly ludicrous signs. Things that say "Obama drinks Christian Baby Blood" or "Jesus wrote the constitution". The more misspelled words the better...You could also dress in overalls with no shirt, or a stained "wifebeater" t-shirt, But you get the general idea.
Some other thoughts are to ask people at the rally to sign a petition renouncing socialism. See just how much info you can get from these folks (name address, DOB, Social Security #). The more data we can mine from the Tea Partiers, the more mayhem we can cause with it!!!!
Yours Truly
The Mad Hatter
It appears that this site only has 35 members, but they have a lot of views/comments on several discussions that lead one to believe that they may have more members. However, even taking this into consideration, I would say that their current membership is probably less than 100 members. Everyone should post this on all websites that we are members of (Tea Party groups, 912 groups and any other groups of similar philosophies of "RESTORING OUR REPUBLIC". I'll do my best to try get some Fox News attention on this as well (Glenn Beck, etc.).
Thursday, April 1, 2010
WHY A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION WOULD NOT WORK
This is a press release from Phyllis Schafly explaining her opinion why a second Constitutional Convention would not work (for instance, in removing the health care law)in today's political climate. I am totally in agreement with her argument.
"Eagle Forum: A second constitutional convention is a terrible idea
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 1, 2010
Washington, D.C. - Phyllis Schlafly, president and founder of the conservative
grassroots public policy organization Eagle Forum, made the following remarks to
address why a national effort for a second constitutional convention (Con Con) is
the wrong way to try to fight President Obama's new government-run health care
law:
"There has been some discussion about the most effective strategy to fight the new
government-run Obamacare law, and I agree that it must be stopped, but spearheading a national effort for a second constitutional convention is not the way to go."
"A new Con Con would be extremely risky. It would be impossible to restrict the
agenda to only one issue. There are no rules in the Constitution or in any law to
limit a Con Con's purpose, procedures, agenda or election of delegates."
"Unlike the first Constitutional Convention in 1787, the 24/7 media would be a
major player and politically active groups would try to shape the agenda and force
votes on their special interests. What if the gun-control lobby tried to force a
vote to repeal the Second Amendment? Even worse, unlike the current makeup of
Congress, a Con Con would not have two chambers or houses, so the big population
states would control and the small population states would be irrelevant."
"Americans should beware of any politicians or candidates for office who think
that they can improve on our Founding Fathers. There are those who say that
because the American people overwhelmingly oppose Obamacare, they must naturally
support a Con Con effort, but the end does not justify the means. Americans do
not want anyone messing around with the U.S. Constitution."
"It is simply not true that a new constitutional convention is the only way to
fight back against Obama's socialization of health care. What America must do is
work to repeal the law in Congress by electing as many conservative candidates to
both the House and Senate in 2010 and 2012. This will set the stage for a full
and outright repeal before the benefits enrollment starts in 2014."
"A new national constitutional convention is a terrible idea and it should be
opposed and defeated in every state legislature.""
"Eagle Forum: A second constitutional convention is a terrible idea
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 1, 2010
Washington, D.C. - Phyllis Schlafly, president and founder of the conservative
grassroots public policy organization Eagle Forum, made the following remarks to
address why a national effort for a second constitutional convention (Con Con) is
the wrong way to try to fight President Obama's new government-run health care
law:
"There has been some discussion about the most effective strategy to fight the new
government-run Obamacare law, and I agree that it must be stopped, but spearheading a national effort for a second constitutional convention is not the way to go."
"A new Con Con would be extremely risky. It would be impossible to restrict the
agenda to only one issue. There are no rules in the Constitution or in any law to
limit a Con Con's purpose, procedures, agenda or election of delegates."
"Unlike the first Constitutional Convention in 1787, the 24/7 media would be a
major player and politically active groups would try to shape the agenda and force
votes on their special interests. What if the gun-control lobby tried to force a
vote to repeal the Second Amendment? Even worse, unlike the current makeup of
Congress, a Con Con would not have two chambers or houses, so the big population
states would control and the small population states would be irrelevant."
"Americans should beware of any politicians or candidates for office who think
that they can improve on our Founding Fathers. There are those who say that
because the American people overwhelmingly oppose Obamacare, they must naturally
support a Con Con effort, but the end does not justify the means. Americans do
not want anyone messing around with the U.S. Constitution."
"It is simply not true that a new constitutional convention is the only way to
fight back against Obama's socialization of health care. What America must do is
work to repeal the law in Congress by electing as many conservative candidates to
both the House and Senate in 2010 and 2012. This will set the stage for a full
and outright repeal before the benefits enrollment starts in 2014."
"A new national constitutional convention is a terrible idea and it should be
opposed and defeated in every state legislature.""
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
